Are Your Meetings Full of Blue Thinking?

SPECIAL GUEST BLOG By Harley Murphy, Strategic Change Mentor, Mentors.ie

We have all participated in meetings which seem to go nowhere, other than around in circle. Studies have demonstrated that significant amounts of senior managers’ time are wasted at unproductive meeting. Even more importantly is the question mark over the quality of decisions being made at such meetings?

In his book “ The Decisive Moment” Jonah Lehrer makes the following observation:

“There is no universal solution to the problem of decision-making. The real world is just too complex. As a result, natural selection endowed us with a brain that is enthusiastically pluralist. Sometimes we need to reason through our options and carefully analyze the possibilities. And sometimes we need to listen to our emotions. The secret is knowing when to use these different styles of thought. We always need to be thinking about how we think.”

One of the great teachers of the skill of thinking is Edward de Bono and he created  the concept of the ‘Six Thinking Hats’. This framework for meetings has now been used, to great effect, by companies all around the globe, including such names as IBM, NASA, DuPont, Shell, BP, Federal Express and many others.

The Six Thinking Hats

One of the great strengths of the Six Thinking Hats approach is its simplicity. Each of the six thinking hats has a colour: white, red, black, yellow, green and blue. The ‘hats’ are intended to be visualised and normally real hats are not used in the process. The colour provides the name for the hat and is related to its function:

White Hat: White is neutral and objective. The white hat is concerned with facts and figures.

Red Hat: Red suggests anger & emotion to many people. The red hat is concerned with the emotional view.

Black Hat: Black is somber and serious. The black hat is cautious, careful and all about risk. It points out potential weaknesses or consequences arising from an idea.

Yellow Hat: Yellow is sunny & positive. The yellow hat is optimistic and concerns positive thinking.

Green Hat: Green is about growth and abundance. The green hat indicates creativity and innovative thinking.

Blue Hat: Blue is cool. The blue hat is concerned with control and process. It’s about organizing the thinking process and the use of the other hats.

 

Using the Six Thinking Hats in a Meeting

You need to just remember the colour and the associations of each hat. The function of the hat in the meeting will then follow.  In a meeting the hats should always be referred to by their colour rather than their function. There is good reason for this, as asking someone to give his or her emotional reaction to something may carry a connotation resulting in a less honest answer. This is because many people still think it is wrong to be emotional in a business context. However, referring to putting on your red hat is more neutral, carrying less connotations.  Similarly, asking someone to ‘take off their black hat for a moment’ is less threatening than asking them to stop being cautious. The neutrality of the colours allows the hats to be used in a meeting context in a way that is not confrontational. Thinking then becomes a game with defined rules.

There are two basic ways of using the hats:

The hats can be used singly to request a type of thinking. In this case you may come to a point in a meeting where you want to generate some fresh options. For example,  ‘……. I think we need some green hat thinking here.’ Or ‘ …..Maybe we should have some black hat on this.

Alternatively, the hats can be used in sequence to explore a subject or solve a problem.  The sequence may be made up of two, three, four or more hats.  In this case it is recommended that a pre-set sequence is agreed at the beginning of the meeting, under an initial blue hat (process).  Small variations from the pre-set sequence are permitted, depending on output.

Edward de Bono wrote that there are two main purposes to the Six Thinking Hats concept. The first is to simplify thinking by allowing a thinker to deal with one thing at a time. Instead of having to take care of emotions, logic, hope and creativity all at the same time, the thinker can deal with them separately. The second purpose is to allow a switch in thinking.  If an individual at a meeting has been persistently negative, that person can be asked to take off his black hat. By turning it into role play the concept of the hats makes it possible to request certain types of thinking. This can also be very liberating.

Rarely do we find men who willingly engage in hard, solid thinking. There is an almost universal quest for easy answers and half-baked solutions. Nothing pains some people more than having to think.

Martin Luther King Jnr.

That Which Does Not Kill Us… Part 2 of 2

SPECIAL GUEST BLOG By Harley Murphy, Strategic Change Mentor, Mentors.ie

Where do we go from here?

Importantly, Jim Collins states that their research indicates that while decline is largely self-inflicted by those who sought to lead, he makes the following single statement on the back-cover of his book:

“Whether you prevail or fail, endure or die, depends more on what you do yourself than on what the world does to you.”

What I have found hugely encouraging is my own personal experience of the resourcefulness and perseverance of many small and medium business leaders who have used their creativeness and optimism to survive and look to grow in this environment. They are living the words quoted above.  This capacity was recognized nearly two centuries ago by another famous author:

“I know of no more encouraging fact than the unquestioned ability of a man to elevate his life by conscious endeavour. ” - Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862)

It is not the politicians who will get us out of this mess but the collective leadership of many individuals helping the nation return to the fundamentals of a strong economy and fair society:

  • Banks as risk managers and intermediaries, not just profit machines;
  • Properties as homes & offices ,not just investment vehicles;
  • Individual integrity over status and one-upmanship:
  • Value for money over rip-off and short-termism;
  • Remuneration based on merit & capability, not special position or power to disrupt;
  • Honesty rather than cute-hoorism;
  • Living within our means, rather than trying to keep up with the Joneses.

In our change management business we use the metaphor of the ‘burning platform’ to describe a situation where transformational change becomes an inevitable consequence of a dramatic event(s).  We can certainly use that metaphor in relation to the banking collapse in Ireland. However, we are always careful not to take this metaphor too far as then decisions can be made out of fear and desperation rather than resilience and creativity.

That Which Does Not Kill Us… Part 1 of 2

SPECIAL GUEST BLOG By Harley Murphy, Strategic Change Mentor, Mentors.ie

There may indeed be truth in Nietzsche’s statement based on a recent report in the Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. The study by Mark Seery of the State University of New York & others concluded that adverse experiences may foster subsequent resilience with resulting advantages for mental health and well being.

This possibly helps explain that those who experienced early recessions seem to be coping better with the current severe downturn. It may also ultimately help the country’s national psyche through what will be a bumpy recovery.

There has been much written about the current crises and how we got here. I felt it worthwhile, however, to bring a fresh perspective on the seeds of collapse from the corporate world. This is taken from a highly respected US author, Jim Collins, who has studied companies for many years and wrote the international bestseller – Good to Great.

How did it come to be so?

In simple terms we know that Ireland’s crises arose from a property bubble bursting – the result of overindulgence, accommodated by cheap money, and enabled by inept leadership and bad management in the political, banking and regulatory systems. However, as a general lesson it could be useful to gain some understanding of signs of decline and possible wider application for the future.

In his 2009 book – “How the Mighty FALL” – Jim Collins, writing about the corporate world, wrote of the five stages of decline and these can be applied equally well, I believe, to the Irish banking crisis, including its regulators, developers, and the many political failures:

Hubris, born of success – Collins says that Stage 1 kicks-in when people become arrogant, regarding success as their entitlement and lose sight of the underlying factors that created success in the first place. Senior bankers, developers and politicians overestimate their own merits and capabilities and forget the role that luck and circumstance played in their earlier success.

Undisciplined pursuit of more – The hubris from Stage 1 leads right into Stage 2 and results in more growth, more acclaim, more of whatever those in power see as “success”.  This results in undisciplined leaps beyond the ‘normal’ boundaries that were manageable and thus sharply increasing risk.

Denial of risk and peril – the internal warning signs mount, yet external results remain strong enough to “explain away” disturbing data. Leaders discount negative data, and amplify positive data.  Collins says that in this stage, those in power start to blame external factors (e.g.Lehman’s) for setbacks rather than accept responsibility. He adds that when those in power begin to imperil the entire enterprise by taking outsize risks and acting in a way that denies the consequences of those risks and are headed for Stage 4.

Grasping for salvation – at this Stage the emergence of cumulative peril and risks gone bad throw the enterprise into sharp decline visible to all. The crucial question is, – How does its leadership respond? Those who grasp for salvation have fallen into Stage 4. Common saviours include a bold but untested strategy, radical transformation or any number of other silver bullet solutions. Initial results from taking dramatic action may appear positive but they do not last.

Capitulation to irrelevance or death – the longer the ‘enterprise’ remains in Stage 4, repeatedly grasping for silver bullets, the more likely it will spiral downward. In Stage 5, accumulated setbacks and expensive false starts erode the financial position and individual spirit to such an extent that all hope is abandoned of building a successful future.  In extreme cases the enterprise simply dies outright. Obviously the latter can be applied to Anglo and Irish Nationwide but a sovereign country cannot die. It can, however, become moribund unless we find the national capacity to become successful again.

I'll return in a couple of days to let you know – Where do we go from here?

© 2010 Mentors.ie All rights reserved.

Powered by Wordpress